| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) Discovery is vulnerable to unenforced encryption due to port 80 (HTTP) being open, allowing unencrypted access. An attacker with access to the network traffic can sniff packets from the connection and uncover the data. |
| HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insecure permissions on private cryptographic keys. The private cryptographic keys located on a Windows host machine might be subject to overly permissive file system permissions. |
| HCL BigFix Platform is affected by insufficient authentication. The application might allow users to access sensitive areas of the application without proper authentication. |
| HCL Sametime for iOS is impacted by a sensitive information disclosure. Hostnames information is written in application logs and certain URLs. |
| The NMAP Importer service may expose data store credentials to authorized users of the Windows Registry.
|
| HCL Workload Scheduler stores user credentials in plain text which can be read by a local user. |
| HCL BigFix Query is affected by a sensitive information disclosure in the WebUI Query application. An HTTP GET endpoint request returns discoverable responses that may disclose: group names, active user names (or IDs). An attacker can use that information to target individuals with phishing or other social-engineering attacks. |
| A security vulnerability in HCL Compass can allow attacker to gain unauthorized database access. |
| The BigFix WebUI application responds with HOST information from the HTTP header field making it vulnerable to Host Header Poisoning Attacks. |
| Improper authentication in the API authentication middleware of HCL DevOps Loop allows authentication tokens to be accepted without proper validation of their expiration and cryptographic signature. As a result, an attacker could potentially use expired or tampered tokens to gain unauthorized access to sensitive resources and perform actions with elevated privileges. |
| The BigFix SaaS's HTTP responses were missing some security headers. The absence of these headers weakens the application's client-side security posture, making it more vulnerable to common web attacks that these headers are designed to mitigate, such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Clickjacking, and protocol downgrade attacks. |
| HCL Unica Campaign 12.1.10 is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) where an attacker injects malicious script into an HTTP request, which is then reflected unsafely in the server's immediate response to the victim's browser, executing the script as if it originated from the trusted website. |
| HCL Unica MaxAI Workbench is vulnerable to improper input validation. This allows attackers to exploit vulnerabilities such as SQL Injection, XSS, or command injection, leading to unauthorized access or data breaches, etc. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. |
| The HTTP host header can be manipulated and cause the application to behave in unexpected ways. Any changes made to the header would cause the request to be sent to a completely different domain/IP address. |
| Improper access restrictions in HCL BigFix Remote Control Server WebUI (versions 10.1.0.0248 and lower) allow non-admin users to view unauthorized information on certain web pages. |
| HCL Unica MaxAI Assistant is susceptible to a HTML injection vulnerability. An attacker could insert special characters that are processed client-side in the context of the user's session. |
| HCL iNotes is susceptible to a Reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can specially craft a URL to execute script in a victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting Web site and/or steal the victim's cookie-based authentication credentials. |
| HCL Sametime is vulnerable to broken server-side validation. While the application performs client-side input checks, these are not enforced by the web server. An attacker can bypass these restrictions by sending manipulated HTTP requests directly to the server. |
| HCL Traveler is affected by sensitive information disclosure. The application generates some error messages that provide detailed information about errors and failures, such as internal paths, file names, sensitive tokens, credentials, error codes, or stack traces. Attackers could exploit this information to gain insights into the system's architecture and potentially launch targeted attacks. |
